Ryzen 7 4700U vs Core i7-7820HQ
Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
23.23k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
20.13k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
4.57k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
7.92k (x0.99)
TOTAL
49.53k
55.85k (x1.13)
Multithread
4700U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
85.54k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
87.07k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
20.37k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
3.57k (x0.66)
TOTAL
269.56k
196.55k (x0.73)
Performance/W
4700U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
4700U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4