| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4700U vs Core i7-1065G7


Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
706e5
Core
Renoir
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
28.19k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
22.13k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
10.32k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
14.17k (x1.77)
TOTAL
49.53k
74.82k (x1.51)

Multithread

4700U

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
86.39k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
86.22k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
32.99k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
8.75k (x1.62)
TOTAL
269.56k
214.34k (x0.8)

Performance/W
4700U
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
4700U
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4