Ryzen 7 4700U vs Core i5-9400F
Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ea
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/6
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
27.15k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
23.63k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
5.38k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
11.61k (x1.45)
TOTAL
49.53k
67.77k (x1.37)
Multithread
4700U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
156.61k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
138k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
29.45k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
7.14k (x1.32)
TOTAL
269.56k
331.19k (x1.23)
Performance/W
4700U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
4700U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4