Ryzen 7 4700U vs Core i5-1035G1
Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
706e5
Core
Renoir
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
171.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
21.5k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
17.71k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
7.92k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
8.24k (x1.03)
TOTAL
49.53k
55.37k (x1.12)
Multithread
4700U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
73.03k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
68.19k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
24.89k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
5.54k (x1.02)
TOTAL
269.56k
171.65k (x0.64)
Performance/W
4700U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
11443 points/W
Performance/GHz
4700U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4