| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4700U vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.

Summarizing, the 4700U is 3.8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f10
Core
Renoir
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
71.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
10.73k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
18.15k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
3.99k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
3.89k (x0.49)
TOTAL
49.53k
36.77k (x0.74)

Multithread

4700U

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
20.11k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
36.87k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
10.74k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
3.31k (x0.61)
TOTAL
269.56k
71.02k (x0.26)

Performance/W
4700U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
4735 points/W

Performance/GHz
4700U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4