Ryzen 7 4700U vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806d1
Core
Renoir
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
24.09k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
19.54k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
8.48k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
11.68k (x1.46)
TOTAL
49.53k
63.79k (x1.29)
Multithread
4700U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
220.79k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
225.98k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
79.1k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
11.32k (x2.09)
TOTAL
269.56k
537.18k (x1.99)
Performance/W
4700U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
4700U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4