| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800XT vs 6800H


Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a40f41
Core
Matisse
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen 2
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
21.04k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
22.41k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
10.21k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
24.27k (x1.02)
TOTAL
78.2k
77.93k (x1)

Multithread

3800XT

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
158.65k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
215.86k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
89.45k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
14.77k (x1.14)
TOTAL
508.89k
478.73k (x0.94)

Performance/W
3800XT
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800XT
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4