Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i9-14900K
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 3.5 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 3.5 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b0671
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
137.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
1756.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
63.55k (x3.72)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
32.3k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
18.92k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
22.61k (x0.97)
TOTAL
75.81k
137.37k (x1.81)
Multithread
3800X
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
813.87k (x4.73)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
608.32k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
313.09k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
21.31k (x1.46)
TOTAL
497.74k
1756.59k (x3.53)
Performance/W
3800X
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
6511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
4867 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
2505 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
14053 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
10591 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
3153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
22895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4