Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i9-10940X
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 2.2 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 2.2 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
50657
Core
Matisse
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
105 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
14x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
19712 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
72.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
1088.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
29.75k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
27.44k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
5.81k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
9.05k (x0.39)
TOTAL
75.81k
72.04k (x0.95)
Multithread
3800X
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
485.37k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
472.7k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
113.09k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
16.95k (x1.16)
TOTAL
497.74k
1088.11k (x2.19)
Performance/W
3800X
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
2942 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2865 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
685 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
6595 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
6197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5717 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1210 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
15009 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4