Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i5-4278U
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-4278U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i5-4278U gets 76.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 6.5 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i5-4278U gets 76.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 6.5 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
40651
Core
Matisse
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
34.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
76.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i5-4278U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
17.58k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
9.35k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
3.99k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
3.64k (x0.16)
TOTAL
75.81k
34.55k (x0.46)
Multithread
3800X
i5-4278U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
38.45k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
23.07k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
10k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
4.65k (x0.32)
TOTAL
497.74k
76.18k (x0.15)
Performance/W
3800X
i5-4278U
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
1373 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
824 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
357 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
2721 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i5-4278U
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
5670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
11145 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4