Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i5-10500H
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0652
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
378.99k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.47k
4.98k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
17.92k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
5.81k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.15k
12.55k (x0.5)
TOTAL
55.26k
41.26k (x0.75)
Multithread
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.1k
29.53k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
178.65k
118.16k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.98k
38.43k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.03k
5.29k (x0.33)
TOTAL
326.76k
191.41k (x0.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
15.89k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
25.32k
22.74k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.36k
6.09k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
12.49k (x0.45)
TOTAL
78.71k
57.21k (x0.73)
Multithread
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
136.06k
96.8k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
195.06k
149.1k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.81k
39.68k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.91k
5.28k (x0.41)
TOTAL
441.85k
290.85k (x0.66)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
15.86k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
24.07k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
5.94k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
11.82k (x0.49)
TOTAL
74.98k
57.69k (x0.77)
Multithread
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
97.37k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
154.42k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
38.76k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
5.4k (x0.4)
TOTAL
440.54k
295.96k (x0.67)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
27.93k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
25.41k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
5.91k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
12.85k (x0.55)
TOTAL
75.81k
72.1k (x0.95)
Multithread
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
176.41k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
158.8k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
38.53k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
5.25k (x0.36)
TOTAL
497.74k
378.99k (x0.76)
Performance/W
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
2714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2443 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
5831 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
6207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
16023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4