Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0653
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
227.67k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.47k
4.32k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
15.7k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
5.04k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.15k
7.68k (x0.31)
TOTAL
55.26k
32.73k (x0.59)
Multithread
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
36.1k
16.59k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
178.65k
71.1k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.98k
23.26k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.03k
3.86k (x0.24)
TOTAL
326.76k
114.81k (x0.35)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
13.84k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.32k
19.79k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.36k
5.28k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
8.31k (x0.3)
TOTAL
78.71k
47.22k (x0.6)
Multithread
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
136.06k
54.67k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
195.06k
90.71k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.81k
24.11k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.91k
3.85k (x0.3)
TOTAL
441.85k
173.34k (x0.39)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
13.88k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
20.94k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
5.18k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
8.2k (x0.34)
TOTAL
74.98k
48.19k (x0.64)
Multithread
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
54.88k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
93.17k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
23.34k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
3.85k (x0.29)
TOTAL
440.54k
175.24k (x0.4)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
24.31k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
22.15k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
5.14k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
8.46k (x0.36)
TOTAL
75.81k
60.06k (x0.79)
Multithread
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
101.48k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
98.04k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
24.28k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
3.86k (x0.27)
TOTAL
497.74k
227.67k (x0.46)
Performance/W
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4