Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i9-13900K
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.5 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.5 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b0671
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
1763.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.47k
9.77k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
24.52k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
17.17k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.15k
21.37k (x0.85)
TOTAL
55.26k
72.83k (x1.32)
Multithread
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
36.1k
145.21k (x4.02)
Test#2 (FP)
178.65k
444.95k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.98k
318.3k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.03k
27.2k (x1.7)
TOTAL
326.76k
935.66k (x2.86)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
31.93k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
25.32k
31.54k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.36k
18.8k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
20.82k (x0.75)
TOTAL
78.71k
103.09k (x1.31)
Multithread
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
136.06k
522.07k (x3.84)
Test#2 (FP)
195.06k
584.17k (x2.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.81k
344.38k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.91k
25.36k (x1.96)
TOTAL
441.85k
1475.97k (x3.34)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
31.8k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
32.83k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
18.37k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
21.13k (x0.87)
TOTAL
74.98k
104.13k (x1.39)
Multithread
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
532.97k (x4.06)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
596.78k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
342.96k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
28.6k (x2.14)
TOTAL
440.54k
1501.31k (x3.41)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
58.6k (x3.43)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
33.29k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
17.77k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
19.49k (x0.84)
TOTAL
75.81k
129.15k (x1.7)
Multithread
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
804.04k (x4.67)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
613.45k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
311.08k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
34.5k (x2.37)
TOTAL
497.74k
1763.08k (x3.54)
Performance/W
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
14105 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4