Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i3-13100F
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b06f5
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
47.14k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
25.77k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
13.25k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
14.77k (x0.64)
TOTAL
75.81k
100.94k (x1.33)
Multithread
3800X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
168.51k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
142.8k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
63.57k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
15.34k (x1.05)
TOTAL
497.74k
390.23k (x0.78)
Performance/W
3800X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4