| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i9-12900KF


Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 2.4 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
90672
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
1219.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
28.96k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
30k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
16.94k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
17.14k (x0.71)
TOTAL
74.98k
93.05k (x1.24)

Multithread

3800X

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
166.25k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
172.03k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
96.95k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
55.78k (x4.16)
TOTAL
440.54k
491.01k (x1.11)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
57.05k (x3.34)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
29.66k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
16.48k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
17.78k (x0.77)
TOTAL
75.81k
120.97k (x1.6)

Multithread

3800X

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
546.04k (x3.17)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
437.01k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
211.36k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
24.92k (x1.71)
TOTAL
497.74k
1219.33k (x2.45)

Performance/W
3800X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4