Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i3-1125G4
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.1 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.1 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806c1
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
56.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
241.03k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
22.63k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
17.36k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
8.89k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
7.37k (x0.32)
TOTAL
75.81k
56.25k (x0.74)
Multithread
3800X
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
103.42k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
102.39k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
32.17k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
3.05k (x0.21)
TOTAL
497.74k
241.03k (x0.48)
Performance/W
3800X
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
3657 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
8608 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
6116 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1992 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
15203 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4