Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-8350U
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ea
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
112.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
16.74k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
14.66k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
2.79k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
4.12k (x0.78)
TOTAL
46.91k
38.31k (x0.82)
Multithread
3750H
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
51.05k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
45.59k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
10.69k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
4.78k (x0.79)
TOTAL
175.18k
112.12k (x0.64)
Performance/W
3750H
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
7475 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4