Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-4590S
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4590S is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the i5-4590S gets 78.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the i5-4590S gets 78.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
34.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
117.77k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
4.24k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
10.54k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.76k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
4.29k (x0.78)
TOTAL
30.46k
23.84k (x0.78)
Multithread
3750H
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
15.01k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
37.75k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
17.12k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
8.48k (x1.4)
TOTAL
123.97k
78.37k (x0.63)
Performance/W
3750H
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
231 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2139 points/W
581 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
796 points/W
263 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
130 points/W
TOTAL
3542 points/W
1206 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
945 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4105 points/GHz
2850 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1287 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1378 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
TOTAL
7615 points/GHz
6442 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4