| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i3-6006U gets 67.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 2.6 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
406e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
67.91k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
2.02k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
8.2k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
2.63k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.92k (x0.71)
TOTAL
30.46k
16.77k (x0.55)

Multithread

3750H

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
3.83k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
17.17k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
5.77k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
3.62k (x0.6)
TOTAL
123.97k
30.39k (x0.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
12.6k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
11.66k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
2.71k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
3.68k (x0.7)
TOTAL
46.91k
30.66k (x0.65)

Multithread

3750H

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
29.56k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
27.74k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
6.56k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
4.06k (x0.67)
TOTAL
175.18k
67.91k (x0.39)

Performance/W
3750H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
1971 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
270 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
4528 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1842 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
15330 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4