Ryzen 7 3750H vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.9 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.9 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
327.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
15.5k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
22.96k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
8.78k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
8.5k (x1.61)
TOTAL
46.91k
55.74k (x1.19)
Multithread
3750H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
110.78k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
149.38k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
60.88k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
6.68k (x1.1)
TOTAL
175.18k
327.72k (x1.87)
Performance/W
3750H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
21848 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4