| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Ryzen 5 3500X


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500X is 2.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
870f10
Core
Picasso
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
373.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
15.48k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
22.91k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
7.1k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
21.11k (x4.01)
TOTAL
46.91k
66.61k (x1.42)

Multithread

3750H

3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
90.39k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
139.1k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
53.2k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
90.92k (x14.99)
TOTAL
175.18k
373.61k (x2.13)

Performance/W
3750H
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
5748 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4