| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f10
Core
Picasso
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.8k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
17.38k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
5.17k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.16k (x0.57)
TOTAL
30.46k
29.52k (x0.97)

Multithread

3750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
15.28k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
76.44k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
27.48k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
3.02k (x0.5)
TOTAL
123.97k
122.2k (x0.99)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
14.2k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
23.23k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.35k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
5.18k (x0.98)
TOTAL
46.91k
47.96k (x1.02)

Multithread

3750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
58.24k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
105.72k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
28.73k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
5.59k (x0.92)
TOTAL
175.18k
198.27k (x1.13)

Performance/W
3750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4