Ryzen 7 3750H vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
13.67k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
22.28k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
15.22k (x2.89)
TOTAL
46.91k
56.16k (x1.2)
Multithread
3750H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
81.03k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
145.84k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
39.14k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
6.79k (x1.12)
TOTAL
175.18k
272.8k (x1.56)
Performance/W
3750H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4