| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f81
Core
Picasso
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
15.09k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
23.74k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
8.32k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
5.19k (x0.99)
TOTAL
46.91k
52.35k (x1.12)

Multithread

3750H

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
67k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
89.94k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
36.84k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
4.6k (x0.76)
TOTAL
175.18k
198.38k (x1.13)

Performance/W
3750H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4