Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-11400T
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.8 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.8 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0671
Core
Picasso
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
67.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.51k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
14.2k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
7.63k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
6.06k (x1.1)
TOTAL
30.46k
31.39k (x1.03)
Multithread
3750H
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
7.4k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
31.37k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
18.11k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
10.23k (x1.68)
TOTAL
123.97k
67.1k (x0.54)
Performance/W
3750H
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2139 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
796 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
3542 points/W
1917 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
945 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4105 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1378 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
7615 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4