| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.5 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
806d0
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
24576 kB
Date
July 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.35k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
483.47k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
16.77k
30.84k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
26.38k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.79k
12.66k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.51k
11.74k (x0.52)
TOTAL
74.35k
81.62k (x1.1)

Multithread

3700X

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
167.94k
294.86k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
209.85k
280.92k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.41k
113.9k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.27k
20.16k (x1.79)
TOTAL
483.47k
709.85k (x1.47)

Performance/W
3700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2584 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1452 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
3700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3811 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5976 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1997 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5115 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
16898 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4