| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a70f41
Core
Matisse
Phoenix
Architecture
Zen 2
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.35k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
483.47k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
16.77k
32.74k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
27.35k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.79k
14.23k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.51k
27.41k (x1.22)
TOTAL
74.35k
101.73k (x1.37)

Multithread

3700X

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
167.94k
236.69k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
209.85k
202.63k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.41k
102.8k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.27k
11.28k (x1)
TOTAL
483.47k
553.41k (x1.14)

Performance/W
3700X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
2584 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1452 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
3700X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3811 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5976 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1997 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5115 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
16898 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4