Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a50f00
Core
Matisse
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.35k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
483.47k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
16.77k
21.2k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
25k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.79k
11.44k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.51k
24.22k (x1.08)
TOTAL
74.35k
81.87k (x1.1)
Multithread
3700X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
167.94k
145.13k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
209.85k
198.36k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.41k
85.67k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.27k
5.79k (x0.51)
TOTAL
483.47k
434.96k (x0.9)
Performance/W
3700X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2584 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1452 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3811 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5976 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1997 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5115 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
16898 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4