Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i9-13900HX
Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 482.1 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.8 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 482.1 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.8 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b0671
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.41k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
482.11k points
877.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
16.77k
49.8k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
26.07k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.81k
13.65k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.53k
15.38k (x0.68)
TOTAL
74.41k
104.9k (x1.41)
Multithread
3700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
165.4k
375.69k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
208.96k
329.21k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.87k
157.71k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
14.89k (x1)
TOTAL
482.11k
877.5k (x1.82)
Performance/W
3700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2545 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3215 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1429 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
229 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
7417 points/W
15955 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3811 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5978 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2002 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5120 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
16911 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4