Ryzen 7 3700U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 3700U is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
406f1
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.75k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.2k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.37k
12.16k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
11.82k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
3.02k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
2.4k (x0.73)
TOTAL
38.75k
29.39k (x0.76)
Multithread
3700U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
46.27k
103.77k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
85.35k
102.28k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.83k
26.13k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.65k (x1.51)
TOTAL
157.2k
237.83k (x1.51)
Performance/W
3700U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3085 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5690 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1455 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
10480 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2842 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4949 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1070 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
826 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
9687 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4