| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3700U vs Core i5-6500


Description
The 3700U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-6500 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i5-6500 gets 179.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6500 is 1.1 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
38.75k points
53.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.2k points
179.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700U
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.37k
22.86k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
19.86k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
4.56k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
6.03k (x1.83)
TOTAL
38.75k
53.31k (x1.38)

Multithread

3700U

i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
46.27k
84.51k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
85.35k
73.04k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.83k
16.05k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.71k (x1.52)
TOTAL
157.2k
179.3k (x1.14)

Performance/W
3700U
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
3085 points/W
1300 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5690 points/W
1124 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1455 points/W
247 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
88 points/W
TOTAL
10480 points/W
2758 points/W

Performance/GHz
3700U
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
2842 points/GHz
6350 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4949 points/GHz
5516 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1070 points/GHz
1265 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
826 points/GHz
1676 points/GHz
TOTAL
9687 points/GHz
14808 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4