Ryzen 7 3700U vs Core i5-10500T
Description
The 3700U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.9 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.9 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0653
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.75k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.2k points
302.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.37k
25.16k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
22.28k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
5.18k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
11.97k (x3.62)
TOTAL
38.75k
64.6k (x1.67)
Multithread
3700U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
46.27k
144.86k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
85.35k
120.98k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.83k
32.55k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.73k (x1)
TOTAL
157.2k
302.13k (x1.92)
Performance/W
3700U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3085 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5690 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1455 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
10480 points/W
8632 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2842 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4949 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1070 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
826 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
9687 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4