Ryzen 7 3700U vs Core i5-1035G4
Description
The 3700U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
706e5
Core
Picasso
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.75k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.2k points
142.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.37k
25.53k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
19.99k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
9.31k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
10.81k (x3.27)
TOTAL
38.75k
65.64k (x1.69)
Multithread
3700U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
46.27k
58.46k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
85.35k
57.31k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.83k
20.1k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
6.81k (x1.82)
TOTAL
157.2k
142.69k (x0.91)
Performance/W
3700U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3085 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5690 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1455 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
10480 points/W
9513 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2842 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4949 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1070 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
826 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
9687 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4