Ryzen 7 3700U vs Core i3-8100
Description
The 3700U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.3 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.3 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906eb
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
38.75k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.2k points
200.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.37k
24.47k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
21.52k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
4.95k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
8.24k (x2.49)
TOTAL
38.75k
59.18k (x1.53)
Multithread
3700U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
46.27k
92.86k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
85.35k
83.05k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.83k
18.55k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.93k (x1.58)
TOTAL
157.2k
200.4k (x1.27)
Performance/W
3700U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3085 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5690 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1455 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
10480 points/W
3083 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
2842 points/GHz
6797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4949 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1070 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
826 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
9687 points/GHz
16438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4