| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3700U vs Ryzen 5 7530U


Description
The 3700U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 7530U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7530U is 1.1 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Barcelo-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
38.75k points
31.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.2k points
171.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.37k
8.81k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
10.18k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
4.31k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
8.66k (x2.62)
TOTAL
38.75k
31.96k (x0.82)

Multithread

3700U

7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.27k
55.98k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
85.35k
76k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.83k
34.38k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.04k (x1.34)
TOTAL
157.2k
171.39k (x1.09)

Performance/W
3700U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
3085 points/W
3732 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5690 points/W
5066 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1455 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
10480 points/W
11426 points/W

Performance/GHz
3700U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
2842 points/GHz
1957 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4949 points/GHz
2262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1070 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
826 points/GHz
1925 points/GHz
TOTAL
9687 points/GHz
7103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4