Ryzen 7 3700U vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The 3700U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.6 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.6 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
38.75k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.2k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.37k
14.34k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
17.67k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
6.41k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
14.95k (x4.53)
TOTAL
38.75k
53.37k (x1.38)
Multithread
3700U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
46.27k
83.58k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
85.35k
119.22k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.83k
48.56k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.83k (x1.02)
TOTAL
157.2k
255.19k (x1.62)
Performance/W
3700U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3085 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5690 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1455 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
10480 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2842 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4949 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1070 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
826 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
9687 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4