Ryzen 7 3700U vs Core i7-11700F
Description
The 3700U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 3.3 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700U gets a score of 157.2 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 3.3 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0671
Core
Picasso
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
38.75k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.2k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.37k
32.55k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
26.95k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.28k
10.76k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
19.32k (x5.85)
TOTAL
38.75k
89.58k (x2.31)
Multithread
3700U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
46.27k
232.06k (x5.02)
Test#2 (FP)
85.35k
203.56k (x2.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.83k
72.89k (x3.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.81k (x1.02)
TOTAL
157.2k
512.32k (x3.26)
Performance/W
3700U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3085 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5690 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1455 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
10480 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
2842 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4949 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1070 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
826 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
9687 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4