Ryzen 7 2700X vs Xeon X5670
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 428.2 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.7 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 428.2 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.7 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
206c2
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
8/16
6 /6
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
8.35k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
5.58k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
3.32k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
3k (x0.14)
TOTAL
66.21k
20.26k (x0.31)
Multithread
2700X
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
49.72k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
35.19k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
21.88k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
8.6k (x0.88)
TOTAL
428.19k
115.4k (x0.27)
Performance/W
2700X
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1208 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2189 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
588 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
4078 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3540 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5609 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4884 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
15397 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4