Ryzen 7 2700X vs N100
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 4.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 4.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
b06e0
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
105 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
15.23k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
11.04k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.54k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
4.98k (x0.28)
TOTAL
64.83k
36.79k (x0.57)
Multithread
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
37.07k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
32.57k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
14.75k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
3.9k (x0.48)
TOTAL
431.14k
88.29k (x0.2)
Performance/W
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4