Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-14600K
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-14600K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-14600K gets 1066.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-14600K is 2.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-14600K gets 1066.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-14600K is 2.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
b0671
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raptor Lake-R
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
114.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
1066.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-14600K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
51.59k (x3.36)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
30.19k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
15.42k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
17.58k (x0.98)
TOTAL
64.83k
114.78k (x1.77)
Multithread
2700X
i5-14600K
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
473.05k (x3.84)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
375.3k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
189.55k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
28.68k (x3.51)
TOTAL
431.14k
1066.57k (x2.47)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-14600K
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3784 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
3002 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
229 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
8533 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-14600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
9734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5697 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2909 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
3317 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
21657 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4