Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-11800H (ES)
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806d0
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2018
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
709.85k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.4k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
20.25k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
11.69k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
11.66k (x0.55)
TOTAL
51.17k
48.01k (x0.94)
Multithread
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
38.93k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
191.89k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
108.8k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
14.95k (x1.82)
TOTAL
289.54k
354.57k (x1.22)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
15.22k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
25.2k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
12.66k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
11.66k (x0.56)
TOTAL
66.21k
64.74k (x0.98)
Multithread
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
155.37k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
260.27k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
115.37k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
20.04k (x2.05)
TOTAL
428.19k
551.04k (x1.29)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
17.25k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
25.53k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
12.56k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
11.4k (x0.6)
TOTAL
64.24k
66.74k (x1.04)
Multithread
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
144.5k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
243.41k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
109.02k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
16k (x1.62)
TOTAL
412.13k
512.94k (x1.24)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
30.84k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
26.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
12.66k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
11.74k (x0.65)
TOTAL
64.83k
81.62k (x1.26)
Multithread
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
294.86k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
280.92k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
113.9k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
20.16k (x2.47)
TOTAL
431.14k
709.85k (x1.65)
Performance/W
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
15774 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4