Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 7940HS gets 678.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 7940HS gets 678.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a70f41
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
107.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
678.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
37.07k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
29.49k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
14.86k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
26.29k (x1.46)
TOTAL
64.83k
107.71k (x1.66)
Multithread
2700X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
286.22k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
254.32k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
123.23k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
14.69k (x1.8)
TOTAL
431.14k
678.46k (x1.57)
Performance/W
2700X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
8178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
7266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
3521 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
420 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
19385 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
7129 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5671 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2858 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
5055 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
20713 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4