Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a50f00
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
23.29k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
25.89k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
11.75k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
24.83k (x1.38)
TOTAL
64.83k
85.76k (x1.32)
Multithread
2700X
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
138.16k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
192.12k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
80.84k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
9.93k (x1.21)
TOTAL
431.14k
421.05k (x0.98)
Performance/W
2700X
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4