Ryzen 7 2700X vs 5800X3D
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5800X3D is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a20f12
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
98304 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
83.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
631.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
22.59k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
24.32k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
11.32k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
24.86k (x1.38)
TOTAL
64.83k
83.1k (x1.28)
Multithread
2700X
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
181.41k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
236.12k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
105.13k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
108.48k (x13.27)
TOTAL
431.14k
631.14k (x1.46)
Performance/W
2700X
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
1728 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2249 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1001 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
1033 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
6011 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
5525 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
18467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4