| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs 5800H


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a50f00
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.31k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
17.51k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
10.53k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
23.57k (x1.1)
TOTAL
51.17k
55.92k (x1.09)

Multithread

2700X

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
24.18k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
117.98k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
70.96k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.08k (x0.98)
TOTAL
289.54k
221.19k (x0.76)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
20.37k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
22.52k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
10.18k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
21.49k (x1.2)
TOTAL
64.83k
74.56k (x1.15)

Multithread

2700X

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
144.01k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
191.86k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
84.53k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
6.5k (x0.79)
TOTAL
431.14k
426.9k (x0.99)

Performance/W
2700X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4