Ryzen 7 2700X vs 3800X
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.2 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.2 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
870f10
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
497.74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.47k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
17.41k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
8.23k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
25.15k (x1.18)
TOTAL
51.17k
55.26k (x1.08)
Multithread
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
36.1k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
178.65k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
95.98k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
16.03k (x1.95)
TOTAL
289.54k
326.76k (x1.13)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
17.17k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
25.32k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
8.36k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
27.86k (x1.33)
TOTAL
66.21k
78.71k (x1.19)
Multithread
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
136.06k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
195.06k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
97.81k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
12.91k (x1.32)
TOTAL
428.19k
441.85k (x1.03)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
16.76k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
25.16k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
8.76k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
24.3k (x1.27)
TOTAL
64.24k
74.98k (x1.17)
Multithread
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
131.36k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
198.51k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
97.27k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
13.4k (x1.35)
TOTAL
412.13k
440.54k (x1.07)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
17.1k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
26.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
8.91k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
23.21k (x1.29)
TOTAL
64.83k
75.81k (x1.17)
Multithread
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
172.04k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
214.03k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
97.1k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
14.57k (x1.78)
TOTAL
431.14k
497.74k (x1.15)
Performance/W
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4