Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
860f01
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
327.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
15.5k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
22.96k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
8.78k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
8.5k (x0.47)
TOTAL
64.83k
55.74k (x0.86)
Multithread
2700X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
110.78k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
149.38k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
60.88k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
6.68k (x0.82)
TOTAL
431.14k
327.72k (x0.76)
Performance/W
2700X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
21848 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4