Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-13900KF
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 3.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 3.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
b0671
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
1660.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
61.1k (x3.98)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
31.23k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
17.57k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
18.89k (x1.05)
TOTAL
64.83k
128.79k (x1.99)
Multithread
2700X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
767.22k (x6.23)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
576.38k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
284.31k (x4.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
32.09k (x3.92)
TOTAL
431.14k
1660.01k (x3.85)
Performance/W
2700X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
13280 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4