| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
b0671
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen+
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
1763.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
9.77k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
24.52k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
17.17k (x2.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
21.37k (x1)
TOTAL
51.17k
72.83k (x1.42)

Multithread

2700X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
145.21k (x4.14)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
444.95k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
318.3k (x4.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
27.2k (x3.31)
TOTAL
289.54k
935.66k (x3.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
31.93k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
31.54k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
18.8k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
20.82k (x0.99)
TOTAL
66.21k
103.09k (x1.56)

Multithread

2700X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
522.07k (x4.12)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
584.17k (x2.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
344.38k (x5.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
25.36k (x2.6)
TOTAL
428.19k
1475.97k (x3.45)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
31.8k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
32.83k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
18.37k (x3.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
21.13k (x1.11)
TOTAL
64.24k
104.13k (x1.62)

Multithread

2700X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
532.97k (x4.37)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
596.78k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
342.96k (x5.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
28.6k (x2.89)
TOTAL
412.13k
1501.31k (x3.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
58.6k (x3.82)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
33.29k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
17.77k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
19.49k (x1.09)
TOTAL
64.83k
129.15k (x1.99)

Multithread

2700X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
804.04k (x6.53)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
613.45k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
311.08k (x5.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
34.5k (x4.22)
TOTAL
431.14k
1763.08k (x4.09)

Performance/W
2700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4