| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-13900HX


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
b0671
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen+
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
877.5k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
28.5k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
29.03k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
11.57k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
14.71k (x0.7)
TOTAL
66.21k
83.8k (x1.27)

Multithread

2700X

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
196.13k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
222.91k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
129.21k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
24.26k (x2.48)
TOTAL
428.19k
572.52k (x1.34)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
49.8k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
26.07k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
13.65k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
15.38k (x0.86)
TOTAL
64.83k
104.9k (x1.62)

Multithread

2700X

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
375.69k (x3.05)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
329.21k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
157.71k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
14.89k (x1.82)
TOTAL
431.14k
877.5k (x2.04)

Performance/W
2700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
15955 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4